{
  "id": 2952681,
  "name": "William C. Bell, Administrator, Plaintiff in Error, v. John A. Egelhoff et al., Defendants in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Bell v. Egelhoff",
  "decision_date": "1917-04-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "618",
  "last_page": "619",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "204 Ill. App. 618"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 201,
    "char_count": 2609,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.549,
    "sha256": "47d2ef99f987d3b516c15d9760c28e104b61b8c84d29c863534831c1f9519c33",
    "simhash": "1:c550ca282cddb588",
    "word_count": 426
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T20:49:07.214052+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William C. Bell, Administrator, Plaintiff in Error, v. John A. Egelhoff et al., Defendants in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Thompson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Hamilton & Hamilton, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Thomas F. Ferns, Sumner & Reardon, F. A. Du Hadway and W. J. Chapman, for defendants in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William C. Bell, Administrator, Plaintiff in Error, v. John A. Egelhoff et al., Defendants in Error.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of Jersey county; the Hon. Nobman L. Jones, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 16, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill by William C. Bell, administrator of the estate of John Egelhoff, deceased, complainant, against John A. Egelhoff, Magdelena Grroppel and Joseph Schmeider, defendants, to foreclose a vendor\u2019s lien and for accounting. From a decree dismissing the bill for want of equity, complainant brings error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Vendor and purchaser, \u00a7 259 \u2014when subsequent deed operates as release of liens for sums unpaid by purchasers. Where complainant\u2019s intestate executed a certain deed conveying to two of the defendants certain property upon consideration, in part, of certain future payments to be made by such defendants during the intestate\u2019s life, and later said intestate joined with such defendants in a second deed conveying the property to one of such defendants and a third defendant, held that the second deed was in effect a release of all liens for any sums whatever to be paid under the first deed.\n2. Vendor and purchaser, \u00a7 269*\u2014when foreclosure of vendor\u2019s lien not allowed. Where complainant\u2019s intestate executed a deed conveying certain property \u201cin consideration of $5,000, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,\u201d and other consideration, to certain of the intestate\u2019s children, held that there was no stipulation in the deed that the sum of $5,000 should be paid by the grantees, and no foreclosure of the vendor\u2019s lien would lie because of nonpayment\n3. Annuities\u2014what is effect of death of annuitant before day of payment. If an annuitant dies before the day of payment, his representatives cannot claim any portion of the annuity for the current term.\n4. Vendor and purchaser, \u00a7 273*\u2014when evidence sufficient to show no indebtedness in suit to foreclose lien. Evidence, held sufficient to sustain the finding that defendants were not indebted to the estate of deceased, in a suit by an administrator to foreclose a vendor\u2019s lien for certain payments to be made by grantees of property purchased from intestate and for an accounting.\nHamilton & Hamilton, for plaintiff in error.\nThomas F. Ferns, Sumner & Reardon, F. A. Du Hadway and W. J. Chapman, for defendants in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0618-01",
  "first_page_order": 644,
  "last_page_order": 645
}