#### Catherine Cronin, Defendant in Error, v. Court of Honor, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 22,223.

(Not to he reported in full.)

Abstract of the Decision.

1. Municipal Coubt op Chicago, § 24 * —when assignments of error will not he reviewed. On an appeal from the Municipal Court where the stenographic report had been stricken, and the court had thus nothing before it but the common-law record, held that none of the original assignments of error was open for consideration as they related to that part of the record so stricken. *'

2. Municipal Coubt op Chicago, § 24*—when record will not he examined for omission in abstract. On an appeal from the Municipal Court where the stenographic report had been stricken, and the original assignments of error were therefore not open for consideration, and where appellee was permitted to assign as an additional error that the statement of claim did not state a cause of action, but such statement of claim was not abstracted, held that the court would not go to the record to ascertain what such statement oí claim contained.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Habby P. Dolan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed May 1, 1917.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Catherine Cronin, plaintiff, against ‘ the Court of Honor, defendant, on a fraternal insurance policy. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

Francis J. Sullivan, for plaintiff in error; William B. Risse, of counsel.

P. F. Murray, for defendant in error.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic anti section number.

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.