{
  "id": 5405798,
  "name": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Joe Polansek, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "People v. Polansek",
  "decision_date": "1917-02-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 6,336",
  "first_page": "107",
  "last_page": "107",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ill. App. 107"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 135,
    "char_count": 1499,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.577,
    "sha256": "fc0942a49de08945478edf838275d1f3e19f92f0d016516ea7eca14884b929cb",
    "simhash": "1:434e5db1d1c890fc",
    "word_count": 242
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:37.056812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Joe Polansek, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dibell\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dibell"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "P. L. Jorgenson, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Ralph J. Dady and E. M. Runyard, for defendant in error; W. F. Weiss, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, v. Joe Polansek, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 6,336.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Intoxicating liquors, \u00a7 147 \u2014when evidence insufficient to sustain conviction for selling dder. Evidence held not to sustain conviction under the anti-saloon law for selling cider, un^er the evidence of defendant, and the man from whom he bought the cider shortly before the sale shown as the basis for conviction, that it was sweet cider and not hard cider or fermented liquor.\n2. Intoxicating liquors, \u00a7 147*\u2014when evidence suffident to sustain conviction. Evidence held sufficient to sustain conviction under the anti-saloon law for selling malt liquor.\nError to the County Court of Lake county; the Hon. Pebby L. Persons, Judge, presiding. Heard in. this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed February 10, 1917.\nRehearing denied April 12, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nProsecution by the People of the State of Illinois, plaintiff, against Joe Polansek, defendant, for violation of the act relating to anti-saloon territory. From a \u00a1judgment for conviction under fifteen counts, including a nuisance count, defendant brings error.\nP. L. Jorgenson, for plaintiff in error.\nRalph J. Dady and E. M. Runyard, for defendant in error; W. F. Weiss, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0107-01",
  "first_page_order": 135,
  "last_page_order": 135
}