{
  "id": 5403804,
  "name": "Edward D. Mack, Appellee, v. General Accident Fire & life Assurance Corporation, Limited, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Mack v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.",
  "decision_date": "1917-04-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,331",
  "first_page": "254",
  "last_page": "255",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ill. App. 254"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 151,
    "char_count": 1865,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "sha256": "ca87463c6150b4d261f14fd8370a349e025fb898579c66cc2f0725d0c5ed7b35",
    "simhash": "1:d92ddaf1448bb8d0",
    "word_count": 303
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:37.056812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edward D. Mack, Appellee, v. General Accident Fire & life Assurance Corporation, Limited, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "John A. Bloomingston, for appellant.",
      "M. D. Dolan, for appellee; Freeman K. Blake, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edward D. Mack, Appellee, v. General Accident Fire & life Assurance Corporation, Limited, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,331.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nInstteance, \u00a7 435 \u2014when claim, should \"be prorated because insured was engaged in more hazardous employment. In an action upon an accident insurance policy, where the rate of premium was based upon the occupation of the assured, and where liability was not disclaimed, but it was contended by the defendant that plaintiff was injured in doing an act in an occupation classified as more hazardous than that stated in his application, and that therefore his claim should be prorated, and where, although plaintiff was insured on the basis of being engaged as mill proprietor with office work, he was engaged in the more hazardous occupation of superintending work, prior to and at the time of being injured, held that the judgment in favor of plaintiff on the basis of his being engaged as a mill owner with office work should be reversed, and a judgment entered in the Appellate Court on the basis of his being erigaged in superintending work.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Gemmixi., Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the. March term, 1916.\nReversed and judgment here with findings of fact.\nOpinion filed April 10, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Edward D. Mack, plaintiff, against the General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, Limited, defendant, to recover on an accident insurance policy. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $810, defendant appeals.\nJohn A. Bloomingston, for appellant.\nM. D. Dolan, for appellee; Freeman K. Blake, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0254-01",
  "first_page_order": 282,
  "last_page_order": 283
}