{
  "id": 5404181,
  "name": "Abraham Schwartz, Appellee, v. Hartman Furniture & Carpet Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Schwartz v. Hartman Furniture & Carpet Co.",
  "decision_date": "1917-04-16",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,776",
  "first_page": "330",
  "last_page": "331",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ill. App. 330"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 115,
    "char_count": 1149,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.522,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.7492960360752035e-08,
      "percentile": 0.29738162340738783
    },
    "sha256": "8c4e544ec4786441a09f03900d0751a654ab3951bda7d2556d5d77fda296e649",
    "simhash": "1:124fa2661c1f0184",
    "word_count": 177
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:37.056812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Abraham Schwartz, Appellee, v. Hartman Furniture & Carpet Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Willis G. Shockey, Wiley W. Mills and Henrietta Krighel, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Abraham Schwartz, Appellee, v. Hartman Furniture & Carpet Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,776.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar M. Torrison, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nReversed without remanding.\nOpinion filed April 16, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nProceedings by Abraham Schwartz, claimant, against the Hartman Furniture & Carpet Company, respondent, for compensation under the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act. From a judgment for claimant, respondent appeals.\nAbstract of tlie Decision.\nWorkmen\u2019s Compensation Act, \u00a7 12 \u2014necessity of making claim within prescribed period. The making of a claim within the six months\u2019 period as required by the Workmen\u2019s Compensation Act is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with, and no right of action exists without proof of such claim within the time limited by the act.\nWillis G. Shockey, Wiley W. Mills and Henrietta Krighel, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vole. XI to XV. and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0330-01",
  "first_page_order": 358,
  "last_page_order": 359
}