{
  "id": 5403662,
  "name": "Clifford Hodges, by Alfred Hodges, Appellee, v. Charles A. Coey, trading as Charles A. Coey School of Motoring, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hodges v. Coey",
  "decision_date": "1917-04-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,891",
  "first_page": "417",
  "last_page": "418",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ill. App. 417"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 179,
    "char_count": 2237,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.569,
    "sha256": "3ef5b5546e2ddb0d9d9bc3685bd19f8295912b746970fe225bbb3df1186eaaf9",
    "simhash": "1:ea7be2259e074f58",
    "word_count": 367
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:37.056812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Clifford Hodges, by Alfred Hodges, Appellee, v. Charles A. Coey, trading as Charles A. Coey School of Motoring, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Municipal Court op Chicago, \u00a7 13 \u2014what are essentials of pleading in action of fourth class in tort. In an action of the fourth class in the Municipal Court for personal injuries, the plaintiff is only required to file a brief statement giving the nature of the tort, and such further information as will reasonably inform the defendant of the nature of the case.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Benjamin Levering, for appellant.",
      "Ellis & Westbrooks, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Clifford Hodges, by Alfred Hodges, Appellee, v. Charles A. Coey, trading as Charles A. Coey School of Motoring, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,891.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Automobiles and gabases, \u00a7 3 \u2014when evidence is sufficient to show that driver of automobile was guilty of negligence and bicycle rider not guilty of contributory negligence. In an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by a minor as the result of being struck by the defendant\u2019s automobile, where such minor was riding a bicycle at a street intersection about three freet from the curb, and the automobile as it came into the cross street cut diagonally across at the rate of about fifteen miles an hour and struck plaintiff at a point about three feet from the cerner and carried him about five feet around the corner, held that the finding of the jury .that the plaintiff exercised ordinary care and that defendant was negligent was fully justified from the evidence.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Samuel H. Tbude, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 30, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Clifford Hodges, a minor, by Alfred Hodges, his next friend, plaintiff, against Charles A. Coey, trading as Charles A. Coey School of Motoring, defendant, to recover damages for personal injuries due to a collision between defendant\u2019s automobile and plaintiff\u2019s bicycle. From a judgment for plaintiff for five hundred dollars, defendant appeals.\nBenjamin Levering, for appellant.\nEllis & Westbrooks, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly,' same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0417-01",
  "first_page_order": 445,
  "last_page_order": 446
}