{
  "id": 5409824,
  "name": "Peter Sindak, Appellee, v. Stanley Jaskowiak, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sindak v. Jaskowiak",
  "decision_date": "1917-04-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,922",
  "first_page": "420",
  "last_page": "421",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ill. App. 420"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 164,
    "char_count": 1954,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.553,
    "sha256": "a5ce104d121075a16e56f336a16373338600070fc367b34f45feb4cea3353e9e",
    "simhash": "1:495ecac6d091a1e8",
    "word_count": 333
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:37.056812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Peter Sindak, Appellee, v. Stanley Jaskowiak, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Animals, \u00a7 43 \u2014when evidence is sufficient to sustain judgment for injuries to person by dog. In an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of being bitten by a dog of the defendant, where it appeared that the plaintiff was visiting at a house located in the rear of the lot on which the defendant\u2019s saloon was located; that as he was leaving the premises, the dog, which was being led by a chain, jumped up and bit plaintiff, and that the vicious character of the dog was Imown to the defendant, held that the judgment in favor of the plaintiff would not be disturbed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. S. Dudley, for appellant.",
      "Vincent G. Gallagher and Ernest Messner, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Peter Sindak, Appellee, v. Stanley Jaskowiak, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,922.\n(Not to Tbe reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Animals, \u00a7 46 \u2014when verdict for damages for injuries from hite of dog is not excessive. A verdict for $900, reduced by remittitur to $600, held not excessive where a man was bitten in the leg by the defendant\u2019s dog, and where the leg bled profusely and the laceration of the muscles caused a permanent condition, and plaintiff was under the care of a physician for nearly three months and suffered an actual loss of twenty weeks\u2019 time at $18 a week.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Habbt P. Dolan, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 30, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction Tby Peter Sindak, plaintiff, against Stanley Jaskowiak, defendant, to recover damages, for injuries sustained by being bitten by defendant\u2019s dog. From a judgment for plaintiff for $600, defendant appeals.\nJ. S. Dudley, for appellant.\nVincent G. Gallagher and Ernest Messner, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0420-01",
  "first_page_order": 448,
  "last_page_order": 449
}