{
  "id": 5409699,
  "name": "Catherine Cronin, Defendant in Error, v. Court of Honor, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cronin v. Court of Honor",
  "decision_date": "1917-05-01",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,223",
  "first_page": "443",
  "last_page": "443",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ill. App. 443"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 140,
    "char_count": 1719,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.556,
    "sha256": "6fd08309161d8b977baf4b07543c909141654a3d972c249e4f6a7a75c24524f8",
    "simhash": "1:465d4c815c8e8056",
    "word_count": 286
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:37.056812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Catherine Cronin, Defendant in Error, v. Court of Honor, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Francis J. Sullivan, for plaintiff in error; William B. Risse, of counsel.",
      "P. F. Murray, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Catherine Cronin, Defendant in Error, v. Court of Honor, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,223.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Municipal Coubt op Chicago, \u00a7 24 \u2014when assignments of error will not he reviewed. On an appeal from the Municipal Court where the stenographic report had been stricken, and the court had thus nothing before it but the common-law record, held that none of the original assignments of error was open for consideration as they related to that part of the record so stricken. *'\n2. Municipal Coubt op Chicago, \u00a7 24*\u2014when record will not he examined for omission in abstract. On an appeal from the Municipal Court where the stenographic report had been stricken, and the original assignments of error were therefore not open for consideration, and where appellee was permitted to assign as an additional error that the statement of claim did not state a cause of action, but such statement of claim was not abstracted, held that the court would not go to the record to ascertain what such statement o\u00ed claim contained.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Habby P. Dolan, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed May 1, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Catherine Cronin, plaintiff, against \u2018 the Court of Honor, defendant, on a fraternal insurance policy. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.\nFrancis J. Sullivan, for plaintiff in error; William B. Risse, of counsel.\nP. F. Murray, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic anti section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0443-01",
  "first_page_order": 471,
  "last_page_order": 471
}