{
  "id": 5404218,
  "name": "In the Matter of the Estate of Max M. Hesser, Deceased. Claim of Charles Hueglin et al., Appellees, v. Estate of Max M. Hesser, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Claim of Hueglin v. Estate of Hesser",
  "decision_date": "1917-05-09",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 21,953",
  "first_page": "496",
  "last_page": "496",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ill. App. 496"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1712,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "sha256": "80da354ffda6c386b71ac1b43fbba5dbc39f8001b797ef80f2c077eed9096b60",
    "simhash": "1:16d5d820883d00a4",
    "word_count": 271
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:37.056812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "In the Matter of the Estate of Max M. Hesser, Deceased. Claim of Charles Hueglin et al., Appellees, v. Estate of Max M. Hesser, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Zeisler, Friedman & Zeisler, for appellant.",
      "Walter H. Eckert, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "In the Matter of the Estate of Max M. Hesser, Deceased. Claim of Charles Hueglin et al., Appellees, v. Estate of Max M. Hesser, Appellant.\nGen. No. 21,953.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Contracts, \u00a7 387 \u2014when evidence is sufficient to show \"breach of contract for manufacturing invented article. Evidence held sufficient to sustain finding that deceased\u2019s partner and his executrix refused to perform a contract between the deceased and claimants for the manufacture by claimants of certain forms invented by the deceased, and that the negotiations between the deceased\u2019s partner, his executrix and one of the claimants immediately following the deceased\u2019s death were for the sole purpose of reducing or avoiding claimants\u2019 damages on account of such refusal.\n2. Damases, \u00a7 190*\u2014when evidence is sufficient to sustain verdict. Evidence held sufficient to sustain a finding of $1,500 damages for breach of contract.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Co\u00f3k county; the Hon. John P. McGoobty, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed May 9, 1917.\nCertiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).\nStatement of the Case.\nClaim by Charles Hueglin and others, claimants, against the estate of Max M. Hesser, deceased, for the manufacture by claimants of a certain wire form for holding clothes lines. From a judgment for claimants for $1,500, the administratrix of the estate appeals.\nZeisler, Friedman & Zeisler, for appellant.\nWalter H. Eckert, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0496-01",
  "first_page_order": 524,
  "last_page_order": 524
}