{
  "id": 5410228,
  "name": "Edna Anderson, Appellee, v. E. Stanton Anderson, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Anderson v. Anderson",
  "decision_date": "1917-05-29",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,399",
  "first_page": "595",
  "last_page": "596",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ill. App. 595"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 163,
    "char_count": 1809,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.558,
    "sha256": "d977568370087b9fa3361ee2cda6b7ee6fe5d0aa3c6d14d24a812efc3eff812c",
    "simhash": "1:461e89294c2120d4",
    "word_count": 302
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:37.056812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Edna Anderson, Appellee, v. E. Stanton Anderson, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Leslie H. Whipp, for appellant.",
      "Lloyd D. Heth, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Edna Anderson, Appellee, v. E. Stanton Anderson, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,399.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. George Kebsten, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed May 29, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill for divorce by Edna Anderson, complainant, against E. Stanton Anderson, defendant. From an order committing defendant for contempt of court for refusal to pay $1,075 alimony entered therein, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nDivorce, \u00a7 122 \u2014when order committing defendant for contempt of court for refusal to pay alimony will 6e reversed. Even though the record on appeal from an order committing a defendant for contempt of court in refusing to pay alimony fails to show that there was any petition or affidavit to support the rule to show cause and the failure to appear, in conformity with the usual practice, such irregularities are not ground for reversal if defendant was given an opportunity to appear and purge himself and evidence was heard to support the findings recited in the order of commitment, but where the record shows nothing whereon to predicate the order save the rule, the appearance and an undisposed of motion to quash the same, and further shows that defendant was discharged on his answer to another rule a few days before which set up facts tending to show that no alimony was due at that time, judgment on an order of commitment for the nonpayment of $1,075 will be reversed, where the decree allowed only $100 a month.\nLeslie H. Whipp, for appellant.\nLloyd D. Heth, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0595-01",
  "first_page_order": 623,
  "last_page_order": 624
}