{
  "id": 5404101,
  "name": "D. B. Dowsma, Defendant in Error, v. Louis C. Krueger, trading as Krueger Brothers, and Carmine Rizzuto. Carmine Rizzuto, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dowsma v. Krueger",
  "decision_date": "1917-05-29",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,277",
  "first_page": "609",
  "last_page": "610",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ill. App. 609"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1825,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.518,
    "sha256": "ad24cac7b90f2e19529eb65d59699d0d8f4c9195628a4618d33b2b1b1c393551",
    "simhash": "1:4359c89b521380ec",
    "word_count": 305
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:37.056812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "D. B. Dowsma, Defendant in Error, v. Louis C. Krueger, trading as Krueger Brothers, and Carmine Rizzuto. Carmine Rizzuto, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Mechanics\u2019 liens, \u00a7 162 \u2014what subcontractor suing owner and contractor at law must show. In an action under the Lien Act (Hurd\u2019s Rev. St. ch. 82, sec. 28, J. & A. U 7166), to recover against the owner and contractor jointly for labor and materials furnished as subcontractor, plaintiff must show that he is entitled to a lien on the premises.\n2. Mechanics\u2019 liens, \u00a7 162*\u2014what judgment in action at law by subcontractor against contractor and owner must recite. In an action under the Lien Act (Hurd\u2019s Rev. St. ch. 82, sec. 28, J. & A. If 7166), to recover against the owner and contractor jointly for labor and materials furnished as subcontractor, the judgment must recite the date when the lien attached.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "De Stefano & Mirabella, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Beauregard F. Moseley, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "D. B. Dowsma, Defendant in Error, v. Louis C. Krueger, trading as Krueger Brothers, and Carmine Rizzuto. Carmine Rizzuto, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,277.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. New-come\u00ae, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1916.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed May 29, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by D. B. Dowsma, plaintiff, against Louis C. Krueger, trading as Krueger Brothers, and Carmine Bizzuto, defendants, under Hurd\u2019s Bev. St. ch. 82, sec. 28 (J. & A. ji 7166), to recover for labor and materials alleged to have been furnished by him as a subcontractor on a building owned by defendant Bizzuto. From a verdict and judgment of $238 and costs for plaintiff, defendant Bizzuto prosecutes this writ of error.\nDe Stefano & Mirabella, for plaintiff in error.\nBeauregard F. Moseley, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0609-01",
  "first_page_order": 637,
  "last_page_order": 638
}