{
  "id": 5403088,
  "name": "J. J. Badenoch Company, Appellee, v. Alfred J. Bartnick and Gustav P. Bartnick, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "J. J. Badenoch Co. v. Bartnick",
  "decision_date": "1917-05-29",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,406",
  "first_page": "623",
  "last_page": "624",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "205 Ill. App. 623"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 152,
    "char_count": 1880,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.51,
    "sha256": "972c4739c6fb3c4d82b50571547d20a47fbbc87a7dd0f6acd54518adb7c9c543",
    "simhash": "1:9108b3e4582d32cd",
    "word_count": 296
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T17:46:37.056812+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "J. J. Badenoch Company, Appellee, v. Alfred J. Bartnick and Gustav P. Bartnick, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Booz & Stoll, for appellants.",
      "Feed H. Atwood, Charles O. Loucks and Vernon R. Loucks, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "J. J. Badenoch Company, Appellee, v. Alfred J. Bartnick and Gustav P. Bartnick, Appellants.\nGen. No. 22,406.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Clarence N. Goodwin, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed May 29, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAssumpsit was brought by J. J. Badenoch Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against Bartnick & Son Company, a corporation, defendant. Thereafter the declaration was amended by adding Alfred J. Bartnick and Gustav P. Bartnick, copartners, as additional defendants, and the original defendant was dismissed from the case. Defendants\u2019 pleas were stricken on plaintiff\u2019s motion and a default entered against defendants, from a judgment entered on which they appeal.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Pleading, \u00a7 141*\u2014when affidavit of claim, in support of amended declaration is necessary. Where plaintiff amends his dec- \u2019 laration by adding two other defendants and dismisses the original defendant from the cape, an affidavit of claim in support of the amended declaration against the added defendants is indispensable to the right of the court to enter judgment without other proof.\n2. Pleading, \u00a7 141 \u2014when contention that plaintiff\u2019s claim is not supported by proper affidavit of merits is not waived. The contention that plaintiff\u2019s claim is not supported by a proper affidavit of merits or other competent evidence is not waived by defendants where their affidavits of merits were stricken from the files and judgment was taken against them as by default.\nBooz & Stoll, for appellants.\nFeed H. Atwood, Charles O. Loucks and Vernon R. Loucks, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0623-01",
  "first_page_order": 651,
  "last_page_order": 652
}