{
  "id": 5401813,
  "name": "Charles B. Travis, Defendant in Error, v. George F. Leibrandt, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Travis v. Leibrandt",
  "decision_date": "1917-05-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,095",
  "first_page": "16",
  "last_page": "17",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "206 Ill. App. 16"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1353,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.565,
    "sha256": "9c1755d61056168bec28e3c7044856a24c94e6a9f8cd2cbd073af1ebaf3e1c7e",
    "simhash": "1:1d7fcd21da2f81f9",
    "word_count": 224
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:33:48.967362+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Charles B. Travis, Defendant in Error, v. George F. Leibrandt, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice O\u2019Connor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice O\u2019Connor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Harry A. Biossat, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Ellis & Westbrooks, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Charles B. Travis, Defendant in Error, v. George F. Leibrandt, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,095.\n(Not to be reported in full.\nError to'the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Courtney, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed May 31, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Charles B. Travis, plaintiff, against George F. Leibrandt and the Lincoln State Bank of Chicago, a corporation, defendants, to recover $111. The case was tried before the court without a jury and, after evidence was introduced, plaintiff dismissed as to the Lincoln State Bank and there was a finding and judgment against defendant Leibrandt for the amount of plaintiff\u2019s claim, to reverse which he prosecutes this writ of error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nPrincipal and agent, \u00a7 224 \u2014when \"burden of proving agency is on defendant. In an action against one to recover commissions on the sale of stock, where defendant claims that in making the agreement for such sale he was acting as agent and not for himself, the burden of proving the agency is on him.\nHarry A. Biossat, for plaintiff in error.\nEllis & Westbrooks, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0016-01",
  "first_page_order": 60,
  "last_page_order": 61
}