{
  "id": 5400024,
  "name": "Herbert A. Parkyn, Appellee, v. George R. Turley, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Parkyn v. Turley",
  "decision_date": "1917-05-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,001",
  "first_page": "78",
  "last_page": "79",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "206 Ill. App. 78"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 203,
    "char_count": 2965,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.572,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.621887471290392e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2896966193781954
    },
    "sha256": "7c2b7c5ec578ee0ae180ad3c9123ad5ffd480bf7b9facb631a0084cfd8a7b9cd",
    "simhash": "1:493103975429e048",
    "word_count": 495
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:33:48.967362+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Herbert A. Parkyn, Appellee, v. George R. Turley, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Taylor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Pledges\u2014when action on the case lies against officer of pledgee selling collateral. Action on the case for the conversion of collateral deposited to secure the payment of a note will lie against one who sold it, though he was not the payee of the note but was an officer of the payee in whose possession the collateral was.\n4. Pledges, \u00a7 44 \u2014when evidence sufficient to sustain verdict for plaintiff in action for conversion of collateral. In an action to recover for the conversion of collateral deposited to secure the payment of a note, evidence held to support a verdict for plaintiff.\n5. Pledges, \u00a7 44*\u2014when instructions are correct in action for conversion of collateral. In an action for conversion of pledged collateral, the instructions, considered as a series, held to present the principles of law involved fairly and completely.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Taylor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Fulton, Garey & Deutschman and Frederick A. Bangs, for appellant; Richard H. Colby, of counsel.",
      "Carnahan, Elsdon & Slusser, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Herbert A. Parkyn, Appellee, v. George R. Turley, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,001.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Pledges, \u00a7 44 \u2014when evidence as to oral promise by pledgee to notify pledgor before selling stock is admissible. In an action on the case for the wrongful conversion of certificates of stock deposited as collateral security for the payment of a note, it is not error to permit plaintiff to testify as to an alleged contemporaneous oral promise by defendant to notify him before selling the collateral.\n2. Pledges, \u00a7 44*\u2014when trover lies for conversion of collateral. Where the evidence tended to show that collateral deposited to secure the payment of a note was sold shortly after it was received, not pursuant to the terms of the note and though it had not depreciated, and that when a renewal note was executed it recited the same collateral as though it were still on hand, and there was also evidence of a contemporaneous oral agreement to notify the maker of the note before selling the collateral and that such notice was not given, it was held that trover would lie for the conversion of the collateral.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the' Hon. Mabc\u00fcs Kavanage, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1915.\nCertiorari denied, by Supreme Court (making opinion final).\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed May 31, 1917.\nRehearing denied June 11, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction on the case by Herbert A. Parkyn, plaintiff, against George B. Turley and David M. Bell, defendants, for the conversion of certain certificates of stock. Prom a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $5,395 and costs against defendant Turley, the latter appeals.\nFulton, Garey & Deutschman and Frederick A. Bangs, for appellant; Richard H. Colby, of counsel.\nCarnahan, Elsdon & Slusser, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vole. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0078-01",
  "first_page_order": 122,
  "last_page_order": 123
}