{
  "id": 5399957,
  "name": "William Ryan, Appellee, v. L. E. Brown, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Ryan v. Brown",
  "decision_date": "1917-04-16",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "534",
  "last_page": "535",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "206 Ill. App. 534"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 117,
    "char_count": 1239,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.605,
    "sha256": "2b55937235546c2d1c5702b614b2f3ce348958dd4010cbef5dac8f0cc3719b6c",
    "simhash": "1:c25bf34b12e87715",
    "word_count": 204
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:33:48.967362+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "William Ryan, Appellee, v. L. E. Brown, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Graves\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Graves"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Curran & Dempsey, for appellant.",
      "Prettyman, Velde & Prettyman, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "William Ryan, Appellee, v. L. E. Brown, Appellant.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Tazewell county; \u2022 the Hon, Theodore N. Green, .Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 16, 1917.\nRehearing denied and opinion modified and refilled July 2, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by William Ryan, plaintiff, against L. E. Brown, defendant, to-recover the purchase price paid for a colt sold by defendant to plaintiff. From a judgment for plaintiff for $180, defendant appeals.\nCurran & Dempsey, for appellant.\nPrettyman, Velde & Prettyman, for appellee.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Sales, \u00a7 262*\u2014what constitutes warranty of animal. The statement in the advertisement of a horse for sale that the horse is \u201csound\u201d constitutes a warranty and not a mere representation, especially where the seller offers to return the money paid for any horse which is shown by certificate of the examining veterinarian to have any other unsoundness or blemish than that pointed out before the sale.\n2. Sales, \u00a7 269*\u2014where horse is not sound. A horse which is afflicted with distemper at the time of sale is not sound."
  },
  "file_name": "0534-01",
  "first_page_order": 578,
  "last_page_order": 579
}