{
  "id": 5402020,
  "name": "Morris Casty, Appellee, v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Casty v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Co.",
  "decision_date": "1917-06-11",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,847",
  "first_page": "626",
  "last_page": "627",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "206 Ill. App. 626"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 120,
    "char_count": 1483,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "sha256": "bf6286ee17a20a84847450433a3867a5eac1d14a2b5797b2d91df82f7f27dec9",
    "simhash": "1:071868c41e3efb5c",
    "word_count": 239
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T14:33:48.967362+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Morris Casty, Appellee, v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSukely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nSet-off and recoupment, \u00a7 40 \u2014when evidence is sufficient to warrant judgment on set-off in action on contract. In an action on an account for teaming and hauling where defendant interposed a set-off to recover an overpayment, consisting of a balance due after allowance being made for extras out of a sum paid to plaintiff for services and extras, evidence held insufficient to sustain a judgment for plaintiff and to warrant a judgment for defendant on. his set-off.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice McSukely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Maurice Markowitz and John F. Tyrrell, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Morris Casty, Appellee, v. Lanzit Corrugated Box Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,847.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Charles H. Bowles, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nReversed and judgment here.\nOpinion filed June 11, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Morris Casty, plaintiff, against the Lanzit Corrugated Box Company, a corporation, defendant, to recover on an account for teaming and hauling goods and set-off by defendant to recover for an alleged overpayment, consisting of a balance due after allowance being made for extras out of a sum paid to plaintiff for services and extras. From a judgment for plaintiff for $79.05, defendant appeals.\nMaurice Markowitz and John F. Tyrrell, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0626-01",
  "first_page_order": 670,
  "last_page_order": 671
}