{
  "id": 2921813,
  "name": "National Printing & Engraving Company (a corporation), Winterburn Print Branch, Defendant in Error, v. Samuel L. Winternitz, trading as The Waterdrome Company, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "National Printing & Engraving Co. v. Winternitz",
  "decision_date": "1917-06-27",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,156",
  "first_page": "51",
  "last_page": "52",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 Ill. App. 51"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 158,
    "char_count": 1935,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.596,
    "sha256": "f21286127226c2e7e1cd8738545fad98dea1ba6c18dcd46c5a054a84eb22ea37",
    "simhash": "1:8b9d9a8dd42910ef",
    "word_count": 311
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:52:34.192092+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "National Printing & Engraving Company (a corporation), Winterburn Print Branch, Defendant in Error, v. Samuel L. Winternitz, trading as The Waterdrome Company, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William Friedman, for plaintiff in error.",
      "P. F. Murray, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "National Printing & Engraving Company (a corporation), Winterburn Print Branch, Defendant in Error, v. Samuel L. Winternitz, trading as The Waterdrome Company, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,156.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Caverly, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 27, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by the National Printing & Engraving Company (a corporation), Winterburn Print Branch, plaintiff, against Samuel L. Winternitz, trading as The Waterdrome Company, defendant, for the purchase price of goods. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff for $217.40, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Corporations, \u00a7 516 \u2014 when evidence shows business not incorporated. In an action to recover the purchase price of goods, evidence held to show that defendant was owner of the business by which the goods were purchased, that he was doing business under such name and that the business was not incorporated.\n2. Municipal Court op Chicago, \u00a7 30* \u2014 when granting of leave to amend statement of claim is not ground for reversal. The fact that though leave was given to amend the statement of claim in a case of the fourth class in the Municipal Court of Chicago, which named several defendants who were not served with process, no amendment was actually made, is not ground for reversal.\n3. Appeal and error, \u00a7 471* \u2014 when objection to statement elicited on cross-examination may not be raised. One who elicits a statement from a witness on cross-examination and does not object thereto cannot raise the objection on appeal.\nWilliam Friedman, for plaintiff in error.\nP. F. Murray, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0051-01",
  "first_page_order": 77,
  "last_page_order": 78
}