{
  "id": 2923568,
  "name": "Arbenz Car Company, Defendant in Error, v. Edward J. Ader, Plaintiif in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Arbenz Car Co. v. Ader",
  "decision_date": "1917-06-27",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22, 179",
  "first_page": "53",
  "last_page": "54",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 Ill. App. 53"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 102,
    "char_count": 1087,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.591,
    "sha256": "2c917c59f657df12a0f7423f4a419b2ac47968b83857d187c2e5f303d8ae9c46",
    "simhash": "1:4862d825e0af10dc",
    "word_count": 181
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:52:34.192092+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Arbenz Car Company, Defendant in Error, v. Edward J. Ader, Plaintiif in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William Friedman, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Franklin N. Wood, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Arbenz Car Company, Defendant in Error, v. Edward J. Ader, Plaintiif in Error.\nGen. No. 22, 179.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Chables N. Goomsrow, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 27, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by the Arbenz Car Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against Edward J. Ader, defendant, to recover on a promissory note. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff for $481.50, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nPrincipal and agent, \u00a7 103* \u2014 when evidence shows notice to third person of lack of authority of agent to make settlement. In an action to recover on a promissory note, as a defense to which was set up a settlement with plaintiff\u2019s agent, evidence held sufficient to show that defendant had notice that the agent had no authority to make the settlement.\nWilliam Friedman, for plaintiff in error.\nFranklin N. Wood, for defendant in error."
  },
  "file_name": "0053-01",
  "first_page_order": 79,
  "last_page_order": 80
}