{
  "id": 2925367,
  "name": "E. Knudsen, Defendant in Error, v. Harry Helmick, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Knudsen v. Helmick",
  "decision_date": "1917-06-27",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,160",
  "first_page": "98",
  "last_page": "99",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 Ill. App. 98"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 152,
    "char_count": 1900,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.612,
    "sha256": "4a64eca571cc54bf4866c1b9123211d776823af0165902e7caa4f5e172875cb0",
    "simhash": "1:c83ecab7718e90d9",
    "word_count": 315
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:52:34.192092+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "E. Knudsen, Defendant in Error, v. Harry Helmick, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Taylor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Taylor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "A. W. Martin and Edward H. S. Martin, for plaintiff in error.",
      "George W. Brown, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "E. Knudsen, Defendant in Error, v. Harry Helmick, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 22,160.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Municipal Court op Chicago, \u00a7 13 - \u2014 when statement of claim is sufficient. In an action in the Municipal Court of Chicago to recover money, collected by the defendant and withheld from plaintiff, a statement of claim which informs defendant that it is for rent for specified months, amounting to a specified sum, that it is for rents collected and wrongfully collected after the title to the property had been conveyed to plaintiff, sufficiently informs defendant of the nature of plaintiff\u2019s claim.\n2. Municipal Court op Chicago, \u00a7 28* \u2014 when objection to statement of claim may not be raised. Objection to the sufficiency of the statement of claim in an action in the Municipal Court of Chicago cannot first be raised on appeal.\n3. Principal and agent, \u00a7 167* \u2014 when agent collecting rents is liable to third person. An agent to collect rents to whom notice is given, by notifying him through the person in charge of his office and conducting his business, that the property has been sold by his principal, cannot collect rents from the premises without being liable to such purchaser.\nError to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Court-net, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed June 27, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by E. Knudsen, plaintiff, against Harry Helmick, defendant, to recover money collected and withheld. \u2022 To reverse a judgment for plaintiff for $111.71, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nA. W. Martin and Edward H. S. Martin, for plaintiff in error.\nGeorge W. Brown, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0098-01",
  "first_page_order": 124,
  "last_page_order": 125
}