{
  "id": 2921763,
  "name": "Alonzo J. Cutler, Appellant, v. Charles W. Pardridge, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Cutler v. Pardridge",
  "decision_date": "1917-07-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,293",
  "first_page": "221",
  "last_page": "221",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 Ill. App. 221"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 152,
    "char_count": 1629,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.533,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 6.439325604513732e-08,
      "percentile": 0.39759383655186076
    },
    "sha256": "31606b2568f089e90731dd3d79bb7ec77586d01bbb885baa5e934a3ed68c8cce",
    "simhash": "1:dbf439b5d8889158",
    "word_count": 279
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:52:34.192092+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Alonzo J. Cutler, Appellant, v. Charles W. Pardridge, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Henry S. Robbins, for appellant.",
      "Bradley, Harper & Eheim, for appellee; Thomas E. D. Bradley and Jacob Newman, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Alonzo J. Cutler, Appellant, v. Charles W. Pardridge, Appellee.\nGen. No. 22,293.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1725 \u2014 token decision on former appeal is binding. The decision of the Appellate Court on a former appeal is binding as the law of the case on the same questions on the second appeal.\n2. Boards of trade and exchanges, \u00a7 42* \u2014 when defendant must show damage by breach of contract of credit with brokers. The right of a broker to recover money paid out by him for losses in \u201copen trades\u201d on the Board of Trade of a customer for the failure of the latter to put up margins to secure them cannot he defeated merely because of the existence of a contract of credit and breach thereof by plaintiff, but defendant must show by competent evidence that he was damaged by such breach.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed July 19, 1917.\nStat\u00e9ment of the Case.\nAction by Alonzo J. Cutler, plaintiff, against Charles W. Pardridge, defendant, to recover money paid out by plaintiff as broker for defendant for losses in certain transactions on the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.\nHenry S. Robbins, for appellant.\nBradley, Harper & Eheim, for appellee; Thomas E. D. Bradley and Jacob Newman, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Yols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number. \u2022 \u2022"
  },
  "file_name": "0221-01",
  "first_page_order": 247,
  "last_page_order": 247
}