{
  "id": 2928222,
  "name": "Gleeson Brothers Company, Appellee, v. J. M. Callahan, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Gleeson Bros. v. Callahan",
  "decision_date": "1917-07-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,671",
  "first_page": "227",
  "last_page": "227",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 Ill. App. 227"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 132,
    "char_count": 1480,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.555,
    "sha256": "4cf9650cbf5c16c86619b3576f9fe54c2f6aa283bdad67ee9fa44bf68ed9469c",
    "simhash": "1:5be4ea145607159c",
    "word_count": 250
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:52:34.192092+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Gleeson Brothers Company, Appellee, v. J. M. Callahan, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Daniel Jerka, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Gleeson Brothers Company, Appellee, v. J. M. Callahan, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,671.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Judgment, \u00a7 142 \u2014 when affidavits in support of motion to vacate judgment by default are insufficient. It is no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in refusing to vacate a judgment by default on motion supported by affidavits, where one of the affidavits is by defendant and alleges that he employed a certain attorney, had no personal knowledge that the case was to be tried the particular time and that he had a meritorious defense, and the other is by his attorney that he was ignorant of the rules of court under which the trial was had.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1313* \u2014 presumption that court followed rules in calling case. It will he presumed on appeal that the trial court followed its rules in calling a case for trial.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed July 19, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction on a contract by Gleeson Brothers Company, plaintiff, against J. M. Callahan, defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff for $169 and costs, defendant appeals.\nDaniel Jerka, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0227-01",
  "first_page_order": 253,
  "last_page_order": 253
}