{
  "id": 2922247,
  "name": "A. E. Sundstrom, Appellee, v. Flora M. Weinrich, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Sundstrom v. Weinrich",
  "decision_date": "1917-10-02",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,299",
  "first_page": "313",
  "last_page": "314",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 Ill. App. 313"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 206,
    "char_count": 2934,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.591,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.585662481351499e-08,
      "percentile": 0.350503253278473
    },
    "sha256": "8692cbb7a6ccd07c82c3ac8a2775a55cfbc33047921cc4d79ea694023603ead0",
    "simhash": "1:05d14130509f34aa",
    "word_count": 476
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:52:34.192092+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "A. E. Sundstrom, Appellee, v. Flora M. Weinrich, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n4. Building and construction contracts, \u00a7 25 \u2014 when only substantial performance of contract necessary. The owner of property Is not entitled to damages for delays in the performance of a building contract caused by her own acts, and substantial performance is all that is required of the contractor.\n5. Appeal and erboe, \u00a7 1399* \u2014 when findings of fact by master approved by chancellor not disturbed. Where the evidence is conflicting the findings of fact by the master approved by the chancellor will not be disturbed on review where the evidence of the successful party found in the record is, if uncontradicted, sufficient to support the decree.\n6. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1399* \u2014 what weight given findings of master. In case of conflicting evidence, the findings of a master are to be given the same weight as the verdict1 of a jury.\n7. Interest, \u00a7 1* \u2014 when allowance in equity proper. The allowance of interest in a suit for a mechanic\u2019s lien from the date of the master\u2019s report is not error, since interest, in equity, is allowed because of equitable considerations, and equity gives or withholds interest, as under all the circumstances, it deems equitable and just.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank N. Reed, for appellant.",
      "J. S. Dudley, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "A. E. Sundstrom, Appellee, v. Flora M. Weinrich, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,299.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 866 \u2014 when abstract insufficient. An abstract containing captions of documents filed, jurats and other unserviceable matter, setting forth the decree and master\u2019s report in hcec verba, and omitting important documents introduced in evidence, held insufficient.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1272* \u2014 when presumed that evidence sufficient to sustain findings of master and decree. It will be presumed that the evidence is sufficient to support the findings of the master and the decree where important documents are not preserved in the record.\n3. Appeal and error, \u00a7 864* \u2014 who has duty to malee complete record. Matters pertaining to the completeness of the abstract of the record are the concern of the appellant.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Martin M. Gridley, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 2, 1917.\nRehearing denied October 15, 1917.\nCertiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).\nStatement of the Case.\nBill by A. E. Sundstrom, complainant, a building contractor, against Flora M. Weinrich, defendant, for the enforcement of a mechanic\u2019s lien on defendant\u2019s building. From a decree for complainant for $1,180 and interest from the date of the master\u2019s report, defendant appeals.\nFrank N. Reed, for appellant.\nJ. S. Dudley, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vole. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0313-01",
  "first_page_order": 339,
  "last_page_order": 340
}