{
  "id": 2927746,
  "name": "Annie J. Alke, Appellant, v. Frederick W. Alke, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Alke v. Alke",
  "decision_date": "1917-10-10",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,329",
  "first_page": "495",
  "last_page": "496",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "207 Ill. App. 495"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1380,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.553,
    "sha256": "04f7a684d0b3d7868f153050b6006c8433fdc295a82dfed2d4617a51a64620df",
    "simhash": "1:48e7ee06502c00f8",
    "word_count": 219
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T19:52:34.192092+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Annie J. Alke, Appellant, v. Frederick W. Alke, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Taylor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Taylor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thurman, Hume & Kennedy, for appellant.-",
      "Joseph Cummins, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Annie J. Alke, Appellant, v. Frederick W. Alke, Appellee.\nGen. No. 22,329.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. \"William IN'. Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 10, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction in assumpsit by Annie J. Alke, plaintiff, against Frederick W. Alke, defendant, to recover the sum of $2,000 alleged to be due under a contract relating to property rights of defendant and plaintiff as husband and wife, and of $1,650 with interest alleged to be due as monthly payments under such contract. From a judgment for defendant for costs, complainant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nHusband and\u2019wife, \u00a7 210 \u2014 when evidence shows extinguishment of executory portions of separation agreement 6y consent divorce decree. In an action by a wife against her husband to recover a specific sum and also monthly payments alleged to be due under a separation agreement, evidence held sufficient to show that the executory portions of the contract were extinguished by a consent decree in subsequent divorce proceedings.\nThurman, Hume & Kennedy, for appellant.-\nJoseph Cummins, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0495-01",
  "first_page_order": 521,
  "last_page_order": 522
}