{
  "id": 2917815,
  "name": "Nora Edwards, Appellant, v. Ruth Prust, Appellee",
  "name_abbreviation": "Edwards v. Prust",
  "decision_date": "1917-10-11",
  "docket_number": "",
  "first_page": "30",
  "last_page": "30",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 Ill. App. 30"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "201 Ill. App. 399",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2964116
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/201/0399-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1513,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.547,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08568646280149923
    },
    "sha256": "f54a81e06a453f1a219e644899b9a99f77afd2591645d8846b126d8a2ebcf7b5",
    "simhash": "1:5d5e98e6a8afe299",
    "word_count": 253
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:40:32.195438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Nora Edwards, Appellant, v. Ruth Prust, Appellee."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Eldredge\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Eldredge"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Everett Connelly and Arthur Poorman, for appellant.",
      "Samuel M. Scholfield and John J. Arney, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Nora Edwards, Appellant, v. Ruth Prust, Appellee.\n(Not to he reported iu full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Bailment, \u00a7 25 \u2014what are questions for jury in action against bailee for injury to horse. Whether plaintiff\u2019s son was her agent and had a right to loan her horse to defendant and receive it back from defendant and turn it over to another girl, held, in an action to recover for injuries to the horse while ridden by the girl, to be questions for the jury.\n2. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1744*\u2014when judgment affirmed. Where the instructions, although faulty and subject to criticism, taken as \u2022 a series could not have misled the jury, and two juries had found the facts adversely to appellant, held that the judgment should be affirmed.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Clark county; the Hon. Augustus A. Partlow, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the April term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 11, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Nora Edwards, plaintiff, against Ruth Prust, defendant, to recover for injuries to plaintiff\u2019s horse loaned to defendant by plaintiff\u2019s son. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. For abstract of decision remanding the cause on a former appeal, see Edwards v. Prust, 201 Ill. App. 399.\nEverett Connelly and Arthur Poorman, for appellant.\nSamuel M. Scholfield and John J. Arney, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0030-01",
  "first_page_order": 54,
  "last_page_order": 54
}