{
  "id": 2919968,
  "name": "West Side Brewery Company, Appellee, v. Hans Sorensen, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "West Side Brewery Co. v. Sorensen",
  "decision_date": "1917-10-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,159",
  "first_page": "128",
  "last_page": "129",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 Ill. App. 128"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 157,
    "char_count": 1749,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.523,
    "sha256": "97544fd5501212f64bb11a97107cbac0b43d726cf7a6031fd80155d9104248c3",
    "simhash": "1:015f7875480a1ffc",
    "word_count": 277
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:40:32.195438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "West Side Brewery Company, Appellee, v. Hans Sorensen, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Otto Christensen and M. Emmet Clare, for appellant.",
      "Mechem, Bangs & Harper, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "West Side Brewery Company, Appellee, v. Hans Sorensen, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,159.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from, the Municipal\" Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Richardson, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed October 31, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nReplevin by the West Side Brewery Company, plaintiff, against Hans Sorensen, defendant, to determine the right of possession to certain saloon fixtures. The evidence showed that the premises containing the fixtures were leased by one Jasperson in 1910, who executed a contract acknowledging plaintiff\u2019s ownership of the fixtures. A year and a half later the premises were leased by one Larsen. During the incumbency of these two tenants, plaintiff made changes in and additions to the fixtures. \u2022 Three years and a half after Jasperson\u2019s tenancy had terminated, Larsen sold his lease to defendant, giving him also a bill of sale for which the consideration was $1, but nothing being said as to the fixtures. Defendant claimed that plaintiff had given Jasper son possession of the property and had clothed him with the indicia of ownership and was estopped to deny his ownership. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nReplevin, \u00a7 124 \u2014when evidence supports judgment for plaintiff. In an action of replevin to determine the right to the possession of certain saloon fixtures, evidence held to support a judgment for plaintiff.\nOtto Christensen and M. Emmet Clare, for appellant.\nMechem, Bangs & Harper, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0128-01",
  "first_page_order": 152,
  "last_page_order": 153
}