{
  "id": 2919043,
  "name": "Greek-American Sponge Company, Appellee, v. B. Van Buren, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Greek-American Sponge Co. v. Van Buren",
  "decision_date": "1917-11-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,169",
  "first_page": "254",
  "last_page": "255",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 Ill. App. 254"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 126,
    "char_count": 1345,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.552,
    "sha256": "6161199eacde7e5216026ce0c0b456cf4797f2a08b4ff186e680b2df7e2d9df5",
    "simhash": "1:403d4b10142594d8",
    "word_count": 213
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:40:32.195438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Greek-American Sponge Company, Appellee, v. B. Van Buren, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Rathje & Weseman, for appellant.",
      "Elbert C. Ferguson, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Greek-American Sponge Company, Appellee, v. B. Van Buren, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,169.\n(Not to \u00a1be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 30, 1917.\nRehearing denied December 12, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction for.goods sold and delivered by the G-reek-American Sponge Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against B. Van Bur\u00e9n, defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff for $369.89, defendant appeals.\nRathje & Weseman, for appellant.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and erbob, \u00a7 1411 -\u2014when judgment for plaintiff not disturbed. In an action for goods sold and delivered, where the evidence, while conflicting, is sufficient to support it, a judgment for plaintiff will not he disturbed.\n2. Evidence, \u00a7 67*\u2014when properly excluded. It is not error to refuse to admit evidence which does not tend to prove any issue in dispute.\n3. Sales, \u00a7 329*\u2014when evidence supports verdict for plaintiff. In an action for goods sold and delivered, evidence held to support a verdict for plaintiff.\nElbert C. Ferguson, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0254-01",
  "first_page_order": 278,
  "last_page_order": 279
}