{
  "id": 2919481,
  "name": "Morand Brothers, Appellee, v. Clyde R. Bates, trading as the Blackstone Buffet, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Morand Bros. v. Bates",
  "decision_date": "1917-11-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,176",
  "first_page": "255",
  "last_page": "256",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 Ill. App. 255"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 107,
    "char_count": 1095,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.548,
    "sha256": "3cfa326c21a522570062669c669892ea3713e7b2b6a5fe57d00b45c990abc68f",
    "simhash": "1:286ada4f9416f8f6",
    "word_count": 173
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:40:32.195438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Morand Brothers, Appellee, v. Clyde R. Bates, trading as the Blackstone Buffet, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Goodwin"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Bither & Goff, for appellant.",
      "No appearance for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Morand Brothers, Appellee, v. Clyde R. Bates, trading as the Blackstone Buffet, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,176.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Leo J. Doyle, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed November 30, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Morand Brothers, a corporation, plaintiff, against Clyde B. Bates, trading as the Blackstone Buffet, defendant, for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff for $56.42, defendant appeals.\nBither & Goff, for appellant.\nNo appearance for appellee.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nSales, \u00a7 329 \u2014when evidence insufficient to show purchase on account of defendant. In an action for goods sold and delivered, evidence held insufficient to show that defendant was the proprietor of the saloon for whmh they were purchased or that they were purchased on his account.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0255-01",
  "first_page_order": 279,
  "last_page_order": 280
}