{
  "id": 2921845,
  "name": "Richard Morgan, trading as Chicago Decorating Company, Appellee, v. Charles A. Roland, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Morgan v. Roland",
  "decision_date": "1917-11-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,197",
  "first_page": "290",
  "last_page": "290",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 Ill. App. 290"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 128,
    "char_count": 1309,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.496,
    "sha256": "ce19289b301cfab31a0ec27a4bad6252f1a818ac823965eb665e9e46d18bdb78",
    "simhash": "1:68a49f35100d3158",
    "word_count": 207
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:40:32.195438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Richard Morgan, trading as Chicago Decorating Company, Appellee, v. Charles A. Roland, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Taylor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Taylor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Earl J. Walker, for appellant; A. R. Miller, of counsel.",
      "William Arthur Anderson, for appellee; Charles Goodman, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Richard Morgan, trading as Chicago Decorating Company, Appellee, v. Charles A. Roland, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,197.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nFrauds, Statute of, \u00a7 10 \u2014when evidence shows promise to he an original undertaking. In an action to recover for services rendered and goods sold and delivered, evidence held sufficient to support a finding that defendant requested plaintiff to do the work, that the latter relied only upon defendant\u2019s promise and that such promise was an original and not a collateral undertaking of defendant.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edmund K. Jarecki, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed November 30, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Richard Morgan, \u2022 trading as Chicago Decorating Company, plaintiff, against Charles A. Roland, defendant, to recover an amount claimed to be due for painting and paper hanging. From a judgment for plaintiff for $90, defendant appeals.\nEarl J. Walker, for appellant; A. R. Miller, of counsel.\nWilliam Arthur Anderson, for appellee; Charles Goodman, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV\u00bb and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0290-01",
  "first_page_order": 314,
  "last_page_order": 314
}