{
  "id": 2918201,
  "name": "Richard Farnsworth, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Gromm, Defendant in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Farnsworth v. Gromm",
  "decision_date": "1917-04-19",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 6,373",
  "first_page": "339",
  "last_page": "340",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 Ill. App. 339"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 139,
    "char_count": 1700,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.525,
    "sha256": "e488d0be31af107756092ea5dc9476d6eaf36d8cccdd34e79901ab9f128378c8",
    "simhash": "1:0c55edd9929d00f8",
    "word_count": 268
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:40:32.195438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Richard Farnsworth, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Gromm, Defendant in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Niehaus"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Butters & Clark, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Stead, Woodward & Hibbs, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Richard Farnsworth, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Gromm, Defendant in Error.\nGen. No. 6,373.\n(Not to he reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of La Salle county; the Hon. Joe A. Davis, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed April 19, 1917.\nRehearing denied October 3, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Richard Farnsworth, plaintiff, against William Gromm, defendant, to recover for the use and occupation of certain premises. From a judgment for defendant for costs, upon trial by the court and motion by defendant to exclude. all the evidence, plaintiff brings error.\nButters & Clark, for plaintiff in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAssumbstt, Action oe, \u00a7 62 \u2014when does not lie for use and occupation against contract purchaser of land. Under a contract for the purchase by defendant of certain premises upon partial payments, providing that upon his default in any required payment plaintiff should have the option of terminating the contract and retaining as liquidated damages any 'payments made, and that defendant should retain possession of the premises until such default and exercise of plaintiff\u2019s option, where defendant made default and plaintiff exercised his option by forfeiting and determining the contract and demanding possession of the premises, and defendant surrendered same, held that an action in assumpsit would not lie for use and occupation of the premises or for damages under the contract.\nStead, Woodward & Hibbs, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0339-01",
  "first_page_order": 363,
  "last_page_order": 364
}