{
  "id": 2923339,
  "name": "Frank C. Strickland et al., Appellees, v. Chester A. Sankiewicz, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Strickland v. Sankiewicz",
  "decision_date": "1917-08-07",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 6,444",
  "first_page": "441",
  "last_page": "441",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "208 Ill. App. 441"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 146,
    "char_count": 1665,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.575,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.527646540942415e-08,
      "percentile": 0.34555026181063064
    },
    "sha256": "e1c6f199a8dd43dd9f742550c0211733dafef2e3ff4d3b65ffcb180fa99243b6",
    "simhash": "1:405cc315a0a3cafc",
    "word_count": 271
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:40:32.195438+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Frank C. Strickland et al., Appellees, v. Chester A. Sankiewicz, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dibell\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dibell"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "P. L. Jorgenson, for appellant; Max Przyborski, of counsel.",
      "Stephen H. Kennedy, for appellees; Elam L. Clarke, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Frank C. Strickland et al., Appellees, v. Chester A. Sankiewicz, Appellant.\nGen. No. 6,444.\n(Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1122 -\u2014when case dismissed because of defective abstract. Where an abstract fails to contain process, pleadings, interlocutory order, judgment, prayer or order of appeal, leave to file bill of exceptions, appeal bond, or the first part of bill of exceptions, the appeal should be dismissed.\n2. Debt, Action op, \u00a7 17*\u2014when judgment is improper in form. A judgment, in an action of debt, for both debt and damages and costs and that plaintiff have execution therefor is erroneous, and should be that debt be satisfied upon payment of damages and that execution issue only for damages and costs..\n3. Costs, \u00a7 68*\u2014when of appeal should be taxed against appellant. Costs of appeal should be taxed against appellant where the judgment is reversed on the record and pleadings and judgment are not abstracted.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Lake county; the Hon. Claire C. Edwards, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the' April term, 1917.\nReversed and remanded with directions.\nOpinion filed August 7, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Frank C. Strickland and others, plaintiffs, against Chester A. Sankiewicz, defendant. From a judgment for plaintiffs for $766.66 debt and $416.66 damages, defendant appeals.\nP. L. Jorgenson, for appellant; Max Przyborski, of counsel.\nStephen H. Kennedy, for appellees; Elam L. Clarke, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0441-01",
  "first_page_order": 465,
  "last_page_order": 465
}