#### Elizabeth Lieneman, Defendant in Error, v. Crown Auto Livery, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 23,080. (Not to be reported in full.)

Error to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richabd S. Ttjthill, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed January 31, 1918.

Statement of the Case.

Action by Elizabeth Lieneman, plaintiff, against Crown Auto Livery, a corporation, defendant. To re*454verse a judgment for plaintiff, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.

Abstract of the Decision.

Appeal and ebrob, § 1744 * —when judgment affirmed. Where the motion of defendant in error to strike the bill of exceptions is granted and the only errors assigned and argued relate to the matters preserved by the bill, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

F. J. Karasek and P. B. Levitón, for plaintiff in error.

H. El. Wynekoop, for defendant in error.

*

See Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.