{
  "id": 2910946,
  "name": "Alice Stevenson, Appellee, v. Knights of Pythias, etc., Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Stevenson v. Knights of Pythias",
  "decision_date": "1918-02-12",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 6,507",
  "first_page": "69",
  "last_page": "70",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 69"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 160,
    "char_count": 1806,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.538,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.8591662004228935e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3654570208533393
    },
    "sha256": "86624ea3735576a093c364bf49e63d791cd5dcdb04e045650f6a6e0a87be763b",
    "simhash": "1:876fc99c3437341f",
    "word_count": 309
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Alice Stevenson, Appellee, v. Knights of Pythias, etc., Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dibell\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 894 \u2014ivhat is duty of appellee to make additional abstract complete. An appellee has a right to file an additional abstract to present more fully any part of the record desired to have known to the court, but is under no duty to make it complete.\n2. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 864*\u2014what is duty of appellant as to filing abstract. Rule 16 of the Appellate Court rules requires an appellant to file an abstract sufficient to present the case.\n3. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 864*\u2014what is duty of court of review as to searching record. \u00c1'court of review may search the record to find reasons for affirming but is not required to do so in order to find reasons for reversing, where an abstract is insufficient.\n4. Appeal and ebbob, \u00a7 1752*\u2014when judgment will be affirmed. Abstract and additional abstract held to be insufficient to show the judgment stated in brief appealed from was erroneous, so as to warrant reversal of the judgment.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dibell"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Robert A. J. Shaw, for appellant; S. A. T. Watkins, of counsel.",
      "Cowing & King, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Alice Stevenson, Appellee, v. Knights of Pythias, etc., Appellant.\nGen. No. 6,507. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the County Court of Will county; the Hon. George J. Cowing, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed February 12, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Alice Stevenson, plaintiff, against Knights of Pythias of North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia, defendant, to recover a death benefit because of the death of her son, Joseph Stevenson. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nRobert A. J. Shaw, for appellant; S. A. T. Watkins, of counsel.\nCowing & King, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0069-01",
  "first_page_order": 97,
  "last_page_order": 98
}