{
  "id": 2917335,
  "name": "James G. Scovern, trading as J. G. Scovern & Company, Appellee, v. Sam Schevlen and Isadore Mackavich, trading as Schevlen Produce Company, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Scovern v. Schevlen",
  "decision_date": "1917-12-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,911",
  "first_page": "170",
  "last_page": "171",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 170"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 161,
    "char_count": 1905,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.542,
    "sha256": "0eefc13d648e497acae7ccc459b6e8c95b72b349204d0fcf7783d40500969b43",
    "simhash": "1:596c4b45342d127c",
    "word_count": 305
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "James G. Scovern, trading as J. G. Scovern & Company, Appellee, v. Sam Schevlen and Isadore Mackavich, trading as Schevlen Produce Company, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "David Jacobson, for appellants; Alvin E. Stein, of counsel.",
      "Henry B. Spurlock, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "James G. Scovern, trading as J. G. Scovern & Company, Appellee, v. Sam Schevlen and Isadore Mackavich, trading as Schevlen Produce Company, Appellants.\nGen. No. 22,911. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edward T. Wade, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 21, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by James Gf. Scovern, trading as J. G-. Scovem & Company, plaintiff, against Sam Schevlen and Isadore Mackavich, trading as Schevlen Produce Company, defendants. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.\nDavid Jacobson, for appellants; Alvin E. Stein, of counsel.\nHenry B. Spurlock, for appellee.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Partnership, \u00a7 51 \u2014when admissions as to by one partner are admissible. Admissions of a copartnership made by one defendant out of the presence of the other are admissible as to the one making them, in an action against two defendants as co-partners.\n2. Partnership, \u00a7 32*\u2014what does not affect rights of person dealing with. The fact that there was a corporation of the same name as that of a copartnership was immaterial where the party dealing with the business was ignorant of it and was induced to do business with those engaged in it holding themselves out as partners under that name.\n3. Partnership, \u00a7 48*\u2014when representations as to existence of are admissible. Representations as to the copartnership of defendants sued as copartners made to others than plaintiff, of which he was ignorant, about the same time as the transactions involved with plaintiff and in similar transactions, was admissible where there was other evidence tending to establish an actual copartnership.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vola. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number#"
  },
  "file_name": "0170-01",
  "first_page_order": 198,
  "last_page_order": 199
}