{
  "id": 2916061,
  "name": "McCormick Theological Seminary, Appellee, v. E. F. Thompson, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "McCormick Theological Seminary v. Thompson",
  "decision_date": "1917-12-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 22,947",
  "first_page": "184",
  "last_page": "185",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 184"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 145,
    "char_count": 1579,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.55,
    "sha256": "7b34c52faae3dce9f47884612a24860bb632859366a678df40779ccce3783029",
    "simhash": "1:89b5cbe2551d129c",
    "word_count": 254
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "McCormick Theological Seminary, Appellee, v. E. F. Thompson, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Thompson, Moore & Clark, 'for appellant.",
      "Mather & Hutson, for appellee; Claude B. Church, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "McCormick Theological Seminary, Appellee, v. E. F. Thompson, Appellant.\nGen. No. 22,947. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph Sabath, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1916.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 21, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by McCormick Theological Seminary, a corporation, plaintiff, against E. F. Thompson, defendant, for rent. From an order \"denying defendant\u2019s motion to vacate the judgment rendered against him, defendant appeals.\nThompson, Moore & Clark, 'for appellant.\nMather & Hutson, for appellee; Claude B. Church, of counsel.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nEstoppel, \u00a7 6 \u2014when defendant is estopped hy record from claiming that no order placing cause on short cause calendar was entered. Where a record recited that a cause came on for trial before a jury in regular course, defendant being absent and not represented, and that it was placed on.the short cause calendar on a certain date, on which date his attorney was notified to appear, held that such record imported verity and that defendant could not be heard to say as against it that no order placing the cause on the short cause calendar was entered, in a petition to vacate the judgment entered on the trial in the absence of defendant\u2019s attorney, irrespective of the question whether the petition stated a good cause of defense.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0184-01",
  "first_page_order": 212,
  "last_page_order": 213
}