{
  "id": 2920504,
  "name": "Michael J. Collins et al., Appellants, v. Chicago Title & Trust Company et al., Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Collins v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.",
  "decision_date": "1917-12-21",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,135",
  "first_page": "211",
  "last_page": "212",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 211"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [
    {
      "cite": "207 Ill. App. 240",
      "category": "reporters:state",
      "reporter": "Ill. App.",
      "case_ids": [
        2930482
      ],
      "opinion_index": -1,
      "case_paths": [
        "/ill-app/207/0240-01"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 169,
    "char_count": 1873,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.03580807328026e-08,
      "percentile": 0.08570094241015595
    },
    "sha256": "1ce50a823844d695163492bdbd51a4d3b5e18bca07e7589f75ba6f87b03e364d",
    "simhash": "1:5c9a8aa43c2f2494",
    "word_count": 304
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Michael J. Collins et al., Appellants, v. Chicago Title & Trust Company et al., Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Angus Boy Shannon, for appellants; Chauncey M. Millar and John E. Foster, of counsel.",
      "Musgrave, Oppenheim & Lee, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Michael J. Collins et al., Appellants, v. Chicago Title & Trust Company et al., Appellees.\nGen. No. 23,135. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nLandlord and tenant, \u00a7 293 \u2014when tenants not required to pay into court amounts admitted to he due under appraisement. Motion by complainants to require defendant tenants to pay into court certain amounts admitted in defendants\u2019 answers to be due under appraisements made, held properly denied, in a suit to modify or set aside the appraisement, where defendants had tendered to complainants the respective amounts of rent due as fixed by the appraisements and which complainants repeatedly refused to accept, and the object of the bill of complaint was to modify or set aside the appraisements on which the rent was based and not to recover the rent thereunder.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook qounty; the Hon. Fbedbkiok: A. Smith, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed December 21, 1917.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill by Michael J. Collins and others as and comprising the Board of Education of the City of Chicago, complainants, against Chicago Title & Trust Company and others, defendants, to have certain appraisements of complainants\u2019 property modified or set aside. From a decree in favor of defendants, complainants appeal.\nSee a prior opinion, Collins v. McVickers Theater Co., 207 Ill. App. 240, which is controlling as to the points of law involved. See also, Collins v. Crilly, ante, p. 209, and Collins v. Macey Securities Co., post, p. 212.\nAngus Boy Shannon, for appellants; Chauncey M. Millar and John E. Foster, of counsel.\nMusgrave, Oppenheim & Lee, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0211-01",
  "first_page_order": 239,
  "last_page_order": 240
}