{
  "id": 2918972,
  "name": "Paul E. Roegner and Emil F. Roegner, trading as Roegner & Company, Appellees, v. J. A. Frey, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Roegner v. Frey",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-28",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,542",
  "first_page": "303",
  "last_page": "303",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 303"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 141,
    "char_count": 1398,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.561,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 5.061447019797991e-08,
      "percentile": 0.3182604468445844
    },
    "sha256": "11929a7368c75475c9570ba658b182d022779fa068400ea5f4e8327568cdf49e",
    "simhash": "1:0ddbd00e92258008",
    "word_count": 226
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Paul E. Roegner and Emil F. Roegner, trading as Roegner & Company, Appellees, v. J. A. Frey, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William L. Barnum, Jr., for appellant.",
      "George C. Geier, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Paul E. Roegner and Emil F. Roegner, trading as Roegner & Company, Appellees, v. J. A. Frey, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,542. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\nBrokers, \u00a7 37 \u2014when not procuring cause of exchange of property. Plaintiffs were not the procuring cause of the trade of defendant\u2019s property where defendant refused to make the trade, without knowing the name of the owner of the other property, when it was first proposed by plaintiffs, and several months later effected the trade through his answer to an advertisement by the owner of the property, with which plaintiffs had nothing to do.\nDever, J., dissenting.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Dennis W. Sullivan, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1917.\nReversed with judgment of nil capiat.\nOpinion filed January 28, 1918.\nRehearing denied February 11, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Paul E. Roegner and Emil F. Roegner, trading as Roegner & Company, plaintiffs, against J. A. Frey, defendant, to recover a commission claimed on a certain real estate transaction. From a judgment for plaintiffs for $187.50, defendant appeals.\nWilliam L. Barnum, Jr., for appellant.\nGeorge C. Geier, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0303-01",
  "first_page_order": 331,
  "last_page_order": 331
}