{
  "id": 2915641,
  "name": "Geraldine B. Edlund, Defendant in Error, v. Arthur E. Edlund, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Edlund v. Edlund",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-28",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,508",
  "first_page": "312",
  "last_page": "313",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 312"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 154,
    "char_count": 1725,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.517,
    "sha256": "20e2b9add5e389223c012094ce87cb980e830d62d46a464574836537d6cb09df",
    "simhash": "1:c8b18e96bac4b498",
    "word_count": 288
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Geraldine B. Edlund, Defendant in Error, v. Arthur E. Edlund, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dever\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dever"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Farlih H. Ball and G. A. Buresh, for plaintiff in error.",
      "Litziugeb, Healy & Reid, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Geraldine B. Edlund, Defendant in Error, v. Arthur E. Edlund, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 23,508. (Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Charles M. Thomson, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.\nOpinion filed January 28, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill by Geraldine B. Edlund, complainant, against Arthur E-. Edlund, defendant, for divorce on the ground of extreme and repeated cruelty. From a decree for complainant, defendant brings error.\nFarlih H. Ball and G. A. Buresh, for plaintiff in error.\nLitziugeb, Healy & Reid, for defendant in error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Divorce, \u00a7 75 \u2014when decree for divorce reversed. Where a decree adjudging defendant to pay certain permanent alimony and solicitor\u2019s fee made no specific finding of facts upon which such decree was based and the evidence introduced at the trial was not preserved hy complainant by a certificate of evidence or otherwise, held that the decree must he reversed.\n2. Equity, \u00a7 547*-\u2014who must preserve evidence on which decree based. The party in whose favor a decree in chancery is rendered has the legal duty of preserving in some manner the evidence upon which it was based, hy a certificate of evidence or otherwise.\n3. Divorce, \u00a7 75*\u2014when order for temporary alimony reversed. An order for temporary alimony based upon several affidavits not made a part of the record by signing of a certificate of evidence and otherwise without support in the record should be reversed.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0312-01",
  "first_page_order": 340,
  "last_page_order": 341
}