{
  "id": 2913591,
  "name": "Thomson & Taylor Spice Company, Appellee, v. I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Company et al., on appeal of I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Thomson & Taylor Spice Co. v. I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Co.",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-28",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,966",
  "first_page": "331",
  "last_page": "332",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 331"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 182,
    "char_count": 2069,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.543,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.1439944468141598e-07,
      "percentile": 0.5796942215550018
    },
    "sha256": "b3da11fc6c1afa910aba7825a37592f66b00a6e1ab63b93ceb85b394d702eb7c",
    "simhash": "1:711f55e51ced0098",
    "word_count": 327
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Thomson & Taylor Spice Company, Appellee, v. I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Company et al., on appeal of I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n2. Injunction,\" \u00a7 158*\u2014what is puj\u00f3se of preliminary injunction. The purpose of a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status of the parties until the court can determine the merits of the controversy, and it cannot be used for the .purpose of compelling one to undo what he has already done.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Frank H. T. Potter and William C. Rigby, for appellant.",
      "Vent & Warfield, for appellee; Thomas Gf. Vent, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Thomson & Taylor Spice Company, Appellee, v. I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Company et al., on appeal of I. Lanski & Son Scrap Iron Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,966. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Injunction, \u00a7 159 \u2014when temporary injunction against obstruction of street improvidently granted. A temporary injunction, issued on filing of bill, restraining defendants from further obstructing a certain street \u201cthroughout its entire width of sixty-six feet,\u201d where the bill contained no allegation of an intent on the part of defendants to occupy more space than that occupied by them, and containing substantially all the mandatory relief sought by the bill by, in effect, requiring defendants to remove all obstructions, buildings and other things named from the entire' width of the street, was improvidently granted.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Denis E. Sullivan, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1917.\nReversed and injunction dissolved.\nOpinion filed January 28, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill by Thomson & Taylor Spice Company, a corporation, complainant, against the I. Lanski &-Son Scrap Iron Company, a corporation, and others, defendants, to enjoin the defendants from placing certain obstructions in a certain street adjoining plaintiff\u2019s place of business. From an order granting a temporary injunction on the filing of the bill, with notice to Lanski and Son, only, the corporation defendant appeals.\nFrank H. T. Potter and William C. Rigby, for appellant.\nVent & Warfield, for appellee; Thomas Gf. Vent, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0331-01",
  "first_page_order": 359,
  "last_page_order": 360
}