{
  "id": 2915209,
  "name": "Virginia Dreyfuss, v. William Freud et al., Intervening Petitioners; Thomas M. Hoyne et al., Appellees, v. Louis Grollman et al., Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dreyfuss v. Freud",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,273",
  "first_page": "345",
  "last_page": "346",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 345"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 177,
    "char_count": 2176,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.563,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.262838324743992e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6128264620833106
    },
    "sha256": "bbaee4451ed67116d2a5ffa1862adc1f0d19e72313ef0cc865214680ff6ca424",
    "simhash": "1:0872d6221d29427c",
    "word_count": 372
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Virginia Dreyfuss, v. William Freud et al., Intervening Petitioners. Thomas M. Hoyne et al., Appellees, v. Louis Grollman et al., Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Taylor\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Taylor"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Julian C. Byer, for appellants.",
      "Hoyne, O\u2019Connor & Irwin, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Virginia Dreyfuss, v. William Freud et al., Intervening Petitioners. Thomas M. Hoyne et al., Appellees, v. Louis Grollman et al., Appellants.\nGen. No. 23,273. (Not to be reported in full.)\n. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 30, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nPetition by Thomas M. Hoyne and others, petitioners, against Louis Grollman and others, respondents, to establish a lien for an attorney\u2019s fee. From a decree providing that petitioners should have a lien in the sum of $518.65, respondents appeal.\nJulian C. Byer, for appellants.\nHoyne, O\u2019Connor & Irwin, for appellees.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Attorney and client, \u00a7 150 \u2014nature and establishment of attorney\u2019s lien. An attorney\u2019s lien is purely a creature of statute, and the statute must be followed in order to establish it.\n2. Attorney and client, \u00a7 149a*\u2014what is effect of service of notice of attorney\u2019s lien. Where notice has been duly served by an attorney as provided by the Attorney\u2019s Lien Act (J. ,& A. If 611), the attorn'ey becomes a part owner of the decree in favor of the client and stands in the same position as if the client had assigned him an interest in the decree.\n3. Attorney and client, \u00a7 141*\u2014When attorney has lien upon realty. Where the decree in favor of his client is a lien upon realty, an attorney who has served notice as provided by the Attorney\u2019s Lien Act has a lien on such realty.\n4. Attorney and client, \u00a7 141*\u2014what is effect of conveyance of land upon attorney\u2019s lien. The fact that, after an attorney has served notice of his lien, real estate bound by his lien is conveyed by the holders does not destroy his lien, but the grantee takes the realty subject thereto.\n5. Attorney and client, \u00a7 149a*\u2014what is effect of acknotoledging receipt of notice of lien. One who in writing acknowledges receiving notice of a lien cannot thereafter successfully deny it.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number. ."
  },
  "file_name": "0345-01",
  "first_page_order": 373,
  "last_page_order": 374
}