{
  "id": 2920934,
  "name": "C. L. Hartwell, trading as C. L. Hartwell & Company, Appellee, v. Crane & Macmahon, Inc., trading as Virginia & North Carolina Wheel Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Hartwell v. Crane & Macmahon, Inc.",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,190",
  "first_page": "399",
  "last_page": "400",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 399"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 156,
    "char_count": 1802,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.544,
    "sha256": "18c71e078292a679af60ed8b052b17d867d549992058cc04f3529f35ff72f945",
    "simhash": "1:4762bea6992394cd",
    "word_count": 296
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "C. L. Hartwell, trading as C. L. Hartwell & Company, Appellee, v. Crane & Macmahon, Inc., trading as Virginia & North Carolina Wheel Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thomson\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thomson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles C. Stilwell, for appellant.",
      "Herbert A. Schryver, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "C. L. Hartwell, trading as C. L. Hartwell & Company, Appellee, v. Crane & Macmahon, Inc., trading as Virginia & North Carolina Wheel Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,190. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Sales, \u00a7 18 -\u2014when counter proposition deemed accepted. Where one who receives an offer of goods of a certain description at a certain price replies with a counter proposition, and in reply thereto the offerer advises the former that he has concluded to ship the goods as per its first letter and ships the goods, billing them at the price named in the counter proposition, not at that contained in the original offer, he must be deemed to have accepted the counter proposition, and the terms of the contract between the parties is fixed by the terms of the counter proposition and the letter accepting it.\n2. Sales, \u00a7 114*\u2014when contract for sale of lumber not complied with by seller. In an attachment to recover for lumber sold and delivered, evidence examined and held to show that plaintiff failed to comply with the specifications of the contract as to the dimensions of the lumber.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Stelk, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nReversed.\nOpinion filed January 30, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAttachment by C. L. Hartwell, trading as C. L. Hartwell & Company, plaintiff, against Crane & Macmahon, Inc., trading as the Virginia & North Carolina Wh\u00e9el Company, defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff for $577.20 and costs, defendant appeals.\nCharles C. Stilwell, for appellant.\nHerbert A. Schryver, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vois. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topip and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0399-01",
  "first_page_order": 427,
  "last_page_order": 428
}