{
  "id": 2921260,
  "name": "John H. Lloyd, Appellee, v. Lincoln Stars, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lloyd v. Stars",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-30",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,248",
  "first_page": "421",
  "last_page": "421",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 421"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 147,
    "char_count": 1623,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.54,
    "sha256": "6c269b5df2679326004e9dd0e8115b8b7ae252c358a6003a6fa37046b47b34ea",
    "simhash": "1:53245c3c18ab23fd",
    "word_count": 255
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "John H. Lloyd, Appellee, v. Lincoln Stars, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Thomson\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Thomson"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Laurence M. Fine and Edward Drobnis, for appellant.",
      "Ellis & Westbrooks, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "John H. Lloyd, Appellee, v. Lincoln Stars, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,248. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Corporations, \u00a7 390 \u2014when authority of person to sign contract shown. On an attachment suit against a corporation to recover for services rendered under a contract of employment, held that the evidence showed that the person executing such contract was sole proprietor of defendant, and that such contract was admissible in evidence.\n2. Corporations, \u00a7 381*\u2014when ratification of contract of employment shown. Evidence held to show that a corporation ratified a contract of employment made by another, received the benefit thereof and failed to pay in full for such services.\n3. Attachment, \u00a7 246*\u2014what is sufficient to sustain. Where an affidavit for attachment alleges two statutory grounds and defendant denies only one of them in its traverse, the other ground is admitted and is sufficient to sustain the attachment.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John Stele, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 30, 1918.\nRehearing denied February 13, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAttachment hy John H. Lloyd, plaintiff, against Lincoln Stars, a corporation, defendant, to recover for services rendered. From a judgment for plaintiff for $234.15, defendant appeals.\nLaurence M. Fine and Edward Drobnis, for appellant.\nEllis & Westbrooks, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0421-01",
  "first_page_order": 449,
  "last_page_order": 449
}