{
  "id": 2914941,
  "name": "Robert I. Watson, Appellee, v. Chicago Building Construction Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Watson v. Chicago Building Construction Co.",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,203",
  "first_page": "434",
  "last_page": "435",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 434"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 123,
    "char_count": 1255,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.511,
    "sha256": "69c63009ff06b238c303afd4a940f80aba5dacd1d52e2b071f4869de6ad24978",
    "simhash": "1:71f8cb85140f20d0",
    "word_count": 201
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Robert I. Watson, Appellee, v. Chicago Building Construction Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Municipal Court op Chicago, \u00a7 26 \u2014what is not statement of facts. A mere recitation of testimony is not a statement of facts though certified as such.\n2. Contracts, \u00a7 384*\u2014when shown that agreement completed before reduced to writing. In an action to recover for services claimed to have been rendered under a contract, evidence held to support a finding that the agreement was completed before it was put into writing.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "J. Ambrose Gearon, for appellant.",
      "John Lews, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Robert I. Watson, Appellee, v. Chicago Building Construction Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,203. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John F. Haas, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 31, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Robert I. Watson, plaintiff, against Chicago Building Construction Company, a corporation, defendant, to recover for services claimed to have been rendered under a contract. From a judgment for plaintiff for $250, defendant appeals.\nJ. Ambrose Gearon, for appellant.\nJohn Lews, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0434-01",
  "first_page_order": 462,
  "last_page_order": 463
}