{
  "id": 2919890,
  "name": "Orient Manufacturing Company, Appellee, v. C. A. Channell, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Orient Manufacturing Co. v. Channell",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,016",
  "first_page": "438",
  "last_page": "439",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 438"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 190,
    "char_count": 2433,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.546,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 1.3651623038527203e-07,
      "percentile": 0.6371230523478396
    },
    "sha256": "32cf31b8c36fb91641e3dd0f0cfdbd83b912266e9bedb7376cc7bba9269b7d11",
    "simhash": "1:4be6c506d42e18d9",
    "word_count": 409
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Orient Manufacturing Company, Appellee, v. C. A. Channell, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McDonald\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Judgment, \u00a7 616 \u2014when on soire facias set aside. Judgment on a scire facias will not be set aside for mere irregularities in the judgment, but only because the judgment was void or has been paid.\n4. Municipal Court of Chicago, \u00a7 19*\u2014when motion does not lie to vacate judgment. Under section 21 of the Municipal Court Act (Rev. St. ch. 37, J. & A. If 3333), relating to vacation of judgments, a motion made after the expiration of the judgment term and after the overruling of a similar motion made during the term, from which an appeal was taken, will not lie.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McDonald"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "William Friedman, for appellant.",
      "Edward L. England, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Orient Manufacturing Company, Appellee, v. C. A. Channell, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,016. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Judgment\u2014when affidavit in support of motion to vacate judgment of revivor is insufficient. An affidavit in support of a motion to vacate a judgment of revivor, entered by default for want of appearance, which states that the want of appearance was owing to the failure of the stenographer of defendant\u2019s counsel to remind the latter, as directed, to file an appearance and affidavit of merits, but by which it is also disclosed that a clerk in such counsel\u2019s office had, before the return day of the writ, investigated the court\u2019s record for the purpose of preparing an affidavit of defense, does not show due diligence on the part of such counsel nor that defendant had a meritorious defense.\n2. Judgment\u2014when good defense not set forth in affidavit in support of motion to vacate judgment of revivor. An allegation in an affidavit in support of a motion to vacate a judgment of revivor, that defendant was not jointly liable with another defendant and was unaware that no judgment had been entered against the other defendant, does not set forth a good defense.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John R. Newcomer, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March'term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 31, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nScire facias by Orient Manufacturing Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against C. A. Channell, defendant, to revive a judgment for $177.25 and costs against defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.\nWilliam Friedman, for appellant.\nEdward L. England, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0438-01",
  "first_page_order": 466,
  "last_page_order": 467
}