{
  "id": 2917754,
  "name": "Elizabeth Lieneman, Defendant in Error, v. Crown Auto Livery, Plaintiff in Error",
  "name_abbreviation": "Lieneman v. Crown Auto Livery",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,080",
  "first_page": "453",
  "last_page": "454",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 453"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 106,
    "char_count": 1067,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.513,
    "sha256": "bca81d2b2772a16aa463311af2bd51312dfefa4f850b306504d9c10063609c23",
    "simhash": "1:cf558876e02fa6bc",
    "word_count": 175
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Elizabeth Lieneman, Defendant in Error, v. Crown Auto Livery, Plaintiff in Error."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Matchett\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Matchett"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "F. J. Karasek and P. B. Levit\u00f3n, for plaintiff in error.",
      "H. El. Wynekoop, for defendant in error."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Elizabeth Lieneman, Defendant in Error, v. Crown Auto Livery, Plaintiff in Error.\nGen. No. 23,080. (Not to be reported in full.)\nError to the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richabd S. Ttjthill, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 31, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Elizabeth Lieneman, plaintiff, against Crown Auto Livery, a corporation, defendant. To reverse a judgment for plaintiff, defendant prosecutes this writ of error.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nAppeal and ebrob, \u00a7 1744 \u2014when judgment affirmed. Where the motion of defendant in error to strike the bill of exceptions is granted and the only errors assigned and argued relate to the matters preserved by the bill, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.\nF. J. Karasek and P. B. Levit\u00f3n, for plaintiff in error.\nH. El. Wynekoop, for defendant in error.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0453-01",
  "first_page_order": 481,
  "last_page_order": 482
}