{
  "id": 2911747,
  "name": "Ernest N. Braucher, Appellee, v. Board of Examiners of Architects of the State of Illinois, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "Braucher v. Board of Examiners of Architects",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,106",
  "first_page": "455",
  "last_page": "456",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 455"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 210,
    "char_count": 2886,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.531,
    "pagerank": {
      "raw": 4.288273044730779e-08,
      "percentile": 0.2706163563976124
    },
    "sha256": "9688670ed2949ed0c1db857f7609b4c6c02fbc65ab1485d12b4acae16798e738",
    "simhash": "1:47ee893298ad045c",
    "word_count": 462
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Ernest N. Braucher, Appellee, v. Board of Examiners of Architects of the State of Illinois, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Matchett\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Architects and engineers, \u00a7 la \u2014what does not constitute dishonest practice 6y architect. A single transaction, although consisting of the sale of four sets of plans of two buildings, does not constitute \u201cdishonest practices\u2019\u2019 within the meaning of the Architects\u2019 Licensing Act (J. & A. K 484).\n4. Architects and engineers, \u00a7 la*\u2014when citation in proceeding to revolee architect\u2019s license is insufficient. A citation issued in a proceeding to revoke an architect\u2019s license for \u201cdishonest practices\u201d is insufficient where it fails either to allege a fraudulent intent on his part or to set up facts from which such fraudulent intent may be inferred.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Matchett"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Edward J. Brundage and John J. Falvey, for appellant.",
      "Thornton & Chancellor, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Ernest N. Braucher, Appellee, v. Board of Examiners of Architects of the State of Illinois, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,106. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Certiorari, \u00a7 47 \u2014what considered, on return to common-taw writ of. On a return to the common-law writ of certiorari, the court does not consider or weigh the evidence but examines the record solely for the purpose of inquiring, first, whether the inferior tribunal has exceeded its jurisdiction, and, second, whether it has proceeded illegally.\n2. Architects and engineers, \u00a7 la*\u2014when citation in proceeding to revolee architect\u2019s certificate is insufficient. A citation issued in a proceeding to revoke an architect\u2019s license on the grounds of gross incompetency in the construction of buildings and of dishonest practices as a licensed architect is insufficient where it sets forth that the incompetency was ill connection with the sale of four sets of plans of two buildings, but affirmatively alleges that he did not draw the plans and did not supervise the drawing, and fails to allege that he approved them, while it does allege that he knew that the plans were improperly and insufficiently drawn for the purposes for which they were intended.\nAppeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar M. Toebison, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed January 31, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nPetition by Ernest N. Braucher, petitioner, against the Board of Examiners of Architects of the State of Illinois, respondent, for a common-law writ of certiorari. The judgment sustained the writ and ordered that the record of the respondent finding petitioner guilty of gross incompetency and dishonest practice and revoking his license as an architect be quashed. From the judgment on the return to the petition, respondent appeals.\nEdward J. Brundage and John J. Falvey, for appellant.\nThornton & Chancellor, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and. section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0455-01",
  "first_page_order": 483,
  "last_page_order": 484
}