{
  "id": 2913368,
  "name": "National Surety Company, Appellee, v. Charles D. Stone & Company, Appellant",
  "name_abbreviation": "National Surety Co. v. Charles D. Stone & Co.",
  "decision_date": "1918-01-31",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,113",
  "first_page": "456",
  "last_page": "457",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 456"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 143,
    "char_count": 1693,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.537,
    "sha256": "803e38e56d5f68fac9131e0801a72f18492a293a27c44e0cf2df1269406b7f74",
    "simhash": "1:0877d802e42700dd",
    "word_count": 274
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "National Surety Company, Appellee, v. Charles D. Stone & Company, Appellant."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Matchett\ndelivered the opinion of the court.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Matchett"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Baker & Holder, for appellant.",
      "William R. Medaris, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "National Surety Company, Appellee, v. Charles D. Stone & Company, Appellant.\nGen. No. 23,113. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Arnold Heap,, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1917.\nReversed with finding of facts.\nOpinion filed January 31, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction \"by National Surety Company, a corporation, plaintiff, against Charles D. Stone & Company, a corporation, defendant, to recover on a written agreement of defendant to save plaintiff harmless on surety \"bonds executed by it for defendant. From a judgment for plaintiff for $300, defendant appeals.\nAbstract of the Decision.\nIndemnity, \u00a7 11 \u2014when agreement to indemnify surety construed as not including liability on bonds not requested. In an action by a surety company to recover on a written agreement by which defendant applied to have the company furnish all bonds which he \u201crequested,\u201d and which states that defendant \u201crequests\u201d the company to become surety on the bonds \u201cabove applied for,\u201d and that he agrees to save the company harmless, no recovery can be had for a loss on a bond which was not requested in the written application and which defendant did not request plaintiff to furnish, where there is also no course of dealing shown from which such request might be implied nor any custom from which it might be inferred, nor circumstances estopping defendant to deny the making of the request.\nBaker & Holder, for appellant.\nWilliam R. Medaris, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vola. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0456-01",
  "first_page_order": 484,
  "last_page_order": 485
}