{
  "id": 2915240,
  "name": "Philip Gollner Company, Appellant, v. David D. Hepburn et al., Appellees",
  "name_abbreviation": "Philip Gollner Co. v. Hepburn",
  "decision_date": "1918-03-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,648",
  "first_page": "525",
  "last_page": "526",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 525"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 172,
    "char_count": 1971,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.545,
    "sha256": "f7729887387646242f0f8d8399ce9e6f9bc6ea02837c4cd619d6da0eefd12289",
    "simhash": "1:4b2cd7e5100da5dc",
    "word_count": 340
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Philip Gollner Company, Appellant, v. David D. Hepburn et al., Appellees."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice Dever\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Liens, \u00a7 2*\u2014when right to lien denied. The right to a lien is a privilege bestowed by the statutes upon a particular class of persons and will be denied where the person claiming under the statutes has failed to bring himself within their terms.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice Dever"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "D. J. Normoyle, for appellant.",
      "Adams, Crews, Bobb & Wescott, for appellees."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Philip Gollner Company, Appellant, v. David D. Hepburn et al., Appellees.\nGen. No. 23,648. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Mechanics\u2019 liens, \u00a7 68 \u2014when shown that defendant not timely served with notice of claim by subcontractor. On appeal from a judgment in a proceeding to enforce a lien in favor of a subcontractor under Rev. St. ch. 82, sec. 21 (J. & A. 7159), evidence held sufficient to support a finding that the subcontractor had not served defendant with a written notice of his claim within 60 days from the date of the last delivery of material.\n2. Mechanics\u2019 liens, \u00a7 197*\u2014when presumed that payment for material was due subcontractor on delivery. Where it does not appear from the statement of claim in a proceeding to enforce a subcontractor\u2019s lien under Rev. St. ch. 82, sec. 21 (J. & A. H 7159), when the material furnished was to be paid for, it will be presumed that the payment was due on delivery thereof, and such suit to enforce the lien will be barred when not begun within 4 months after the delivery.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edmund K. Jakecki, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 5, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nBill by Philip Gollner Company, a corporation, complainant, against David D. Hepburn and Elizabeth Hepburn, defendants, to enforce a lien under Rev. St. ch. 82, sec. 21 (J. & A. \u00b6 7159). From a judgment for defendants, complainant appeals.\nD. J. Normoyle, for appellant.\nAdams, Crews, Bobb & Wescott, for appellees.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0525-01",
  "first_page_order": 553,
  "last_page_order": 554
}