{
  "id": 2919746,
  "name": "Dora Schoon, Appellee, v. A. H. Welch and H. C. Welch, copartners, trading as Welch & Welch, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Schoon v. Welch",
  "decision_date": "1918-03-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,623",
  "first_page": "544",
  "last_page": "545",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 544"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 153,
    "char_count": 1755,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.539,
    "sha256": "7d6ea7f15118c09e8463b2e151b33208b4a7f800e5c37d63836b81c8db435b48",
    "simhash": "1:655746163c0e36fc",
    "word_count": 291
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Dora Schoon, Appellee, v. A. H. Welch and H. C. Welch, copartners, trading as Welch & Welch, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Appeal and error, \u00a7 1078*\u2014When cross errors necessary. On an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff, where no cross errors are assigned, the Appellate Court will not increase the judgment on plaintiff\u2019s suggestion.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Charles A. Butler, for appellants.",
      "Edward H. Taylor, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Dora Schoon, Appellee, v. A. H. Welch and H. C. Welch, copartners, trading as Welch & Welch, Appellants.\nGen. No. 23,623. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Becision.\n1. Tendee, \u00a7 15 \u2014when amount will he ordered paid to adverse party. Where, in an action for goods sold and delivered, defendants make a tender in court of the amount which they concede is due, such amount may he ordered paid to plaintiff and the balance of the demand reserved for future adjudication.\n2. Sales, \u00a7 329*\u2014when evidence shows agreement between parties and supports verdict for plaintiff. In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, evidence examined and held to show an agreement between the parties and to he sufficient to support a verdict for plaintiff, and not to show that there was any consideration for any agreement entered into subsequent to the original contract varying the terms of the latter.\nAppeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edwabd T. Wade, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 5, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Dora Schoon, plaintiff, against A. H. Welch and H. C. Welch, copartners, trading as Welch & Welch, defendants, for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff for $94.70, defendants appeal.\nCharles A. Butler, for appellants.\nEdward H. Taylor, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, game topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0544-01",
  "first_page_order": 572,
  "last_page_order": 573
}