{
  "id": 2915019,
  "name": "Mary Dobler, Appellee, v. T. G. O'Connor and The Standard Brewery, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Dobler v. O'Connor",
  "decision_date": "1918-03-05",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,645",
  "first_page": "548",
  "last_page": "549",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 548"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 203,
    "char_count": 2884,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.504,
    "sha256": "662d3f9c74dc66bfd1d76175d761a4999b3219967cfc06020c5d681e85fd5cc1",
    "simhash": "1:4426d744d48da399",
    "word_count": 504
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Mary Dobler, Appellee, v. T. G. O\u2019Connor and The Standard Brewery, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Justice McSurely\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\n3. Intoxicating liquors, \u00a7 247 \u2014when amount of damages in action under. Dramshop Act is for jury. In an action under section 9 of the Dramshop Act (J. & A. V 4609) to recover damages for a death caused by intoxication, the question of the amount of damages is for the jury.\n4. Intoxicating liquors, \u00a7 233*\u2014when substantial damages shown to result to mother from death of son. In an action to recover damages brought by a mother, under section 9 of the Dram-shop Act (J. & A. If 4609), for the death of her son, evidence that deceased was 18 years of age, that for more than a year before his death he had been paid $50 a month as a machinist apprentice, which he gave his mother, who used it in the support of herself and her family, that for several months before his death he assisted his father in running a pool room, receiving no wages, but the profits of the pool room being used for the family support, and that after his death she was obliged to take in washing to support the family, is sufficient to show that the death of the son resulted in substantial damages to plaintiff.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Justice McSurely"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Castle, Williams, Long & Castle, for appellants.",
      "Litzinger, Healy & Beid, for appellee; James J. Finn, of counsel."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Mary Dobler, Appellee, v. T. G. O\u2019Connor and The Standard Brewery, Appellants.\nGen. No. 23,645. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Intoxicating liquors, \u00a7 228 \u2014when intoxication of minor shown to he proximate cause of death. In an action by a parent to recover, under section 9 of the Dramshop Act (J. & A. If 4609), for the death of plaintiff\u2019s minor son, evidence examined and held, sufficient to support a finding that deceased was intoxicated and that the intoxication was the proximate cause of his death.\n2. Intoxicating liquors, \u00a7 187*\u2014who may have right of action under section 9 of Dramshop Act. The right of action given by section 9 of the Dramshop Act (J. & A. f 4609) is not limited to those persons only who have a legal right to support.\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Theodore Brentano, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in this court at the October term, 1917.\nAffirmed.\nOpinion filed March 5, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nAction by Mary Dobler, plaintiff, against T. G. O\u2019Connor and The Standard Brewery, a corporation, defendants, under section 9 of the Dram Shop Act (J. & A. \u00b6 4609), to recover damages for the death of plaintiff\u2019s minor son, alleged to have been caused by intoxication produced by liquors sold the son in the saloon of defendant O\u2019Connor, leased by him from defendant Standard Brewery. From a judgment for plaintiff for $1,350, defendants appeal.\nCastle, Williams, Long & Castle, for appellants.\nLitzinger, Healy & Beid, for appellee; James J. Finn, of counsel.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0548-01",
  "first_page_order": 576,
  "last_page_order": 577
}