{
  "id": 2916331,
  "name": "Epoch Producing Corporation, Appellee, v. City of Chicago and Herman F. Schuettler, Appellants",
  "name_abbreviation": "Epoch Producing Corp. v. City of Chicago",
  "decision_date": "1918-03-12",
  "docket_number": "Gen. No. 23,954",
  "first_page": "596",
  "last_page": "597",
  "citations": [
    {
      "type": "official",
      "cite": "209 Ill. App. 596"
    }
  ],
  "court": {
    "name_abbreviation": "Ill. App. Ct.",
    "id": 8837,
    "name": "Illinois Appellate Court"
  },
  "jurisdiction": {
    "id": 29,
    "name_long": "Illinois",
    "name": "Ill."
  },
  "cites_to": [],
  "analysis": {
    "cardinality": 144,
    "char_count": 1592,
    "ocr_confidence": 0.537,
    "sha256": "724cdd1718822f9a52df875ee2a67e69431abec4d45ca978bbb081cac5ca7854",
    "simhash": "1:06539f25180581d2",
    "word_count": 258
  },
  "last_updated": "2023-07-14T15:09:41.322311+00:00",
  "provenance": {
    "date_added": "2019-08-29",
    "source": "Harvard",
    "batch": "2018"
  },
  "casebody": {
    "judges": [],
    "parties": [
      "Epoch Producing Corporation, Appellee, v. City of Chicago and Herman F. Schuettler, Appellants."
    ],
    "opinions": [
      {
        "text": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes\ndelivered the opinion of the court.\nAbstract of the Decision.\n1. Theaters and shows, \u00a7 4 \u2014what are requisites of petition for writ of mandamus to compel issuance of permit to exhibit photo-play. To entitle a petitioner to a writ of mandamus to compel the issuance of a permit to exhibit a photoplay, it is merely necessary to aver facts to show that the photoplay met every requisite of the ordinance under which the license was sought and that the license was arbitrarily or capriciously refused.\n2. Mandamus, \u00a7 190*\u2014when judgment reversed. Where the trial court has disregarded the material issues of fact in mandamus proceedings, the judgment will be reversed.",
        "type": "majority",
        "author": "Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes"
      }
    ],
    "attorneys": [
      "Samuel A. Ettelson, for appellants; Chester E. Cleveland and Frank D. Ayers, of counsel.",
      "Charles J. Trainor, for appellee."
    ],
    "corrections": "",
    "head_matter": "Epoch Producing Corporation, Appellee, v. City of Chicago and Herman F. Schuettler, Appellants.\nGen. No. 23,954. (Not to be reported in full.)\nAppeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph B. David, Judge, presiding.\nHeard in the Branch Appellate Court at the June term, 1917.\nReversed and remanded.\nOpinion filed March 12, 1918.\nStatement of the Case.\nPetition by Epoch Producing Corporation, petitioner, against City of Chicago and Herman F. Schuettler, General Superintendent of Police of the City of Chicago, defendants, for a writ of mandamus to compel the issuance of a permit to exhibit a photo-play. From a judgment for petitioner, defendants appeal.\nSamuel A. Ettelson, for appellants; Chester E. Cleveland and Frank D. Ayers, of counsel.\nCharles J. Trainor, for appellee.\nSee Illinois Notes Digest, Vols. XI to XV, and Cumulative Quarterly, same topic and section number."
  },
  "file_name": "0596-01",
  "first_page_order": 624,
  "last_page_order": 625
}